Reputation Provider-Client protocol: Difference between revisions

From
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
Line 85: Line 85:
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
! style="text-align: right;" | Synopsis:
! style="text-align: right;" | Synopsis:
| colspan="2" | <code>authenticate [new] <var>pubkey</var> <var>response_value</var></code><br/>&#8594; &#8709;
| colspan="2" | <code>challenge <var>response_value</var></code><br/>&#8594; &#8709;
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
! style="text-align: right;" | Arguments:
! style="text-align: right;" | Arguments:
| colspan="2" | <code><var>pubkey</var></code>: The client's public key, BASE64 encoded.<br/><code><var>response_value</var></code>: The response to the challenge.
| colspan="2" | <code><var>response_value</var></code>: The response to the challenge.
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
! style="text-align: right;" | State:
! style="text-align: right;" | State:
| colspan="2" | unauthenticated only
| colspan="2" | authentication-in-progress only
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
! style="text-align: right;" | Description:
! style="text-align: right;" | Description:
| colspan="2" | Completes the authentication procedure if the reserved keyword <code>new</code> is not present. If instead it is present (and the authentication checks out, of course), then a new user account will be created and entered into the database (and the connection will be authenticated).
| colspan="2" | Completes the authentication procedure. Must immediately succeed the response to a <code>login</code> or <code>create</code> command.
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
! style="text-align: right;" rowspan="2" | Response:
! style="text-align: right;" rowspan="2" | Response:
Line 104: Line 104:
|}
|}


==== challenge ====
==== login ====
{|
{|
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
! style="text-align: right;" | Synopsis:
! style="text-align: right;" | Synopsis:
| colspan="2" | <code>challenge</code><br/>&#8594; <code><var>challenge_value</var></code>
| colspan="2" | <code>login <var>pubkey</var></code><br/>&#8594; <code>challenge <var>challenge_value</var></code>
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
! style="text-align: right;" | Arguments:
! style="text-align: right;" | Arguments:
| colspan="2" | <code><var>pubkey</var></code>: The client's public key, BASE64 encoded.
| colspan="2" | none
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
! style="text-align: right;" | State:
! style="text-align: right;" | State:

Revision as of 03:21, 13 May 2006


The Reputation Provider acts as a server and listens on port 2323.

Encryption

The server<->client protocol, or the sessions, should provide protection against:

  • all passive attacks
  • most active attacks

Specifically it seems to only be possible to protect against active attacks (man in the middle) if a trust relationship has already been established, e.g. the client knows the server's public key. (In order to provide confidentiality the server does not need to know the client's public key. This key only becomes important for authenticating clients. The user creation process is possible even for an unauthenticated client.)

To minimize the possibility of protocol design or implementation errors it would be best to use an already existing protocol and implementation, e.g. SSL/TLS and OpenSSL. Problem: SSL uses X.509 certificates and not raw keys. Certificates pose some dangers of introducing accidental side channels, for example through serial numbers, but add next to no additional value. Also: SSL is quite a complex protocol and widely deployed implementation errors (ASN.1!) have not been unheard of.

A homemade protocol would look something like this:

  1. diffie-hellmann between client and server
  2. server signs own diffie-hellmann parameters with own secret key
  3. when the client has verified this signature it knows that it is in fact talking to the right server
  4. connection is then in a state in which the client may
    • transmit a user creation request, or
    • authenticate itself by sending a signed version of its own diffie-hellmann parameter

Discussion

own protocol SSL/TLS
pro
  • uses raw keys, limited side channel possibilities
  • tried and proven design
  • various interoperable implementations
  • may be possible to verify server identity through regular PKI
contra
  • not thoroughly analysed, may be weak
  • some degree of bloat (ASN.1, X.509)

One compromise approach might be: Use SSL and a 'real' certificate for the server (allows verification through PKI) but only a raw key for the client. Then when the connection is set up and authentication is necessary, have the client transmit its public key and sign something with that key. Preferably some secret from the SSL connection (session key or master key perhaps?), but it's probably not possible to get access to this. Alternatively let the server send a challenge and have the client sign that (be wary of replay attacks and the such).

Payload

The cleartext protocol is simple and text-based. All commands are sent by the client. All commands and responses are single lines that end with a single newline ("\n"). The terminating newline is implied and not mentioned explicitly for the rest of this document because it is not technically considered to be a part of the command/response. A command or response MUST NOT have any newline anywhere except for the terminating newline.

Failure to follow any of the regulations in this protocol MAY lead to immediate termination of the connection.

Commands

Commands are single words with no space, followed by optional command specific data that is separated from the command by a single space. The command specific data generally consists of several parameters (with no spaces) concatenated with spaces.

Error Responses

Error responses start with an unhappy smiley, a single space and a three-digit error code, followed by an optional human readable error message. They MUST thus match the following regular expression (PCRE syntax):

/^:-\( \d{3}.*$/

Error codes

Code Message Explanation
400 Bad command The command was malformed or invalid. Note that the server has the option to immediately terminate the connection when it encounters a protocol error and is not obliged to send this response and keep going.
401 Authorization required The command was not executed because the client must authenticate first. See the section on Authentication. A server MAY terminate the connection instead of sending this response if it is extremely paranoid. This is the recommended behaviour. (Remember: Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean that they're not after you.)

Positive Responses

Positive responses start with a happy smiley, a single space and command specific data. Thus they MUST match the following regular expression (PCRE syntax):

/^:-\) .*$/

Authentication

Connections can be in two states: authenticated and unauthenticated. On unauthenticated connections only a minor subset of commands is available. When an unauthenticated client tries to access a command that needs authentication the server either sends a 401 error code or terminates the connection.

In order to initiate the authentication procedure:

  1. The client sends an challenge command with no parameter.
  2. The server sends a positive response with the challenge.
  3. The client sends an authenticate command with its own public key and the signed challenge
  4. Either
    • the server acknowledges the successful authentication with a positive response, if the signature checks out, or
    • should the authentication not be successful for any reason, then the server silently terminates the connection with no error message.

Authentication may be tried exactly once per connection. No other command may be sent between the start of the procedure (the challenge command) and the reception of the positive response to the authenticate command. Any deviation from this protocol is forbidden and MUST lead to a termination of the connection.

List of Commands

authenticate

Synopsis: challenge response_value
→ ∅
Arguments: response_value: The response to the challenge.
State: authentication-in-progress only
Description: Completes the authentication procedure. Must immediately succeed the response to a login or create command.
Response: pos.: none
neg.: none

login

Synopsis: login pubkey
challenge challenge_value
Arguments: pubkey: The client's public key, BASE64 encoded.
State: unauthenticated only
Description: Initiates the authentication procedure. The server responds with a challenge which the client must sign and send back in an authenticate command.
Response: pos.: challenge_value: The challenge, a BASE64 encoded opaque string.
neg.: none