Access Control: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Robsteinde (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
(8 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Who and what has access to which resource has to be controled on every IT System. |
Who and what has access to which resource has to be controled on every IT System. |
||
==Introduction== |
==Introduction== |
||
Controlled are issues like |
|||
*access to files |
|||
*access to memory |
|||
*execution of programs |
|||
*sharing data with other principals |
|||
Access is controlled at different levels: |
|||
*application |
|||
*middleware |
|||
*operating system |
|||
*hardware |
|||
The complexity of administering Access Control is growing complexity. |
|||
==Hardware Protection== |
==Hardware Protection== |
||
Protection Problem: |
|||
preventing one process from interfering with another |
|||
Confinement Problem: |
|||
preventing programs communicating outwards through other than |
|||
authorized channels (e.g. memory overwriting) |
|||
===Intel 80x86 (Pentium) Processors=== |
===Intel 80x86 (Pentium) Processors=== |
||
{| |
|||
|8088/8086: |
|||
|any running program controlled the whole machine |
|||
|- |
|||
|80286: |
|||
|protected segment addressing and rings, operating systems could run proper |
|||
|- |
|||
|80386: |
|||
|built-in virtual memory and large memory segments, treated as a 32-bit flat-address machine |
|||
|} |
|||
====Rings==== |
|||
*process in ring 0 (kernel) manages privilege level of other processes |
|||
*ring 1, 2 usually system processes (e.g. win32 subsys, virtual DOS) |
|||
*ring 3 user programs |
|||
*gates between rings for executing code at an other level |
|||
===Other Procssors=== |
===Other Procssors=== |
||
====Acorn Risc Machine (ARM)==== |
|||
*most commonly licensed to third-party vendors of embedded systems |
|||
*32-bit processor |
|||
*separate banks of registers for user and system processes |
|||
*hardware protection can be customized |
|||
====Security Processors==== |
|||
*hardware security support for cryptography and access control |
|||
*authorized state |
|||
*password covered memory access |
|||
s.o. |
|||
==Operating Systems== |
==Operating Systems== |
||
*access control for files and processes, ring management, IO-management, memory, processors s.o. as deep as the hardware permits it |
|||
*matrix is often used to manage this |
|||
*not usable for large organizations, because the administration becomes to difficult for humans |
|||
Do it by groups and/or roles ! |
|||
===Groups and Roles=== |
===Groups and Roles=== |
||
*every user fits into one or some categories |
|||
*rights have to be defined for these categories |
|||
*user gets role and fits in group |
|||
What is the difference ? |
|||
There‘s no final definition. |
|||
===Access Control Lists=== |
===Access Control Lists=== |
||
*just one column of the access control matrix stored for every resource |
|||
*not very performant |
|||
*difficult to administrate |
|||
====Unix==== |
|||
*simple list: owner, group, world for user – not for programs |
|||
*indirect method for programs: SUID and SGID |
|||
*or by user dummy |
|||
====Win NT==== |
|||
*more attributes (take ownership, change permission, delete) |
|||
*arrangement in domains with trust between them |
|||
===Capabilities=== |
===Capabilities=== |
||
*just one row of the access control matrix stored for every resource |
|||
*some experimental implementatios in the 70s |
|||
*today a comeback in the form of public key certificates |
|||
====Win 2k/XP==== |
|||
*used combined with ACL |
|||
*group policies |
|||
*active directory |
|||
===Understands=== |
===Understands=== |
||
{|border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" |
|||
|valign="top" |Granularity |
|||
| |
|||
*control access at the right level |
|||
*file access ↔ database file |
|||
*different systems, different access controls |
|||
|- |
|||
|Sandboxing |
|||
|access to a restricted environment |
|||
|- |
|||
|Proof-Carrying-Code |
|||
|tests the behaviour of a program |
|||
|- |
|||
|Object Request Brokers |
|||
|controlling calls for several objects/resources |
|||
|} |
|||
==Problems== |
==Problems== |
||
*problem if any level doesn’t controll access |
|||
*"Every system has at least one bug – Windows much more." |
|||
*"The most serious bug is sitting in front of the monitor." |
|||
*smashing the stack |
|||
*bypassing denied permissions |
|||
*trojans |
|||
*structural defects in operating systems (Windows user has to be admin for installation) |
|||
===Background=== |
|||
Decisions were made one time, consequences work eternally, but environment changes very rapidly. |
|||
Sometimes, also a developer uses the easier way to reach a goal. |
|||
Sometimes it‘s just user friendly. |
Latest revision as of 00:43, 8 September 2005
Who and what has access to which resource has to be controled on every IT System.
Introduction
Controlled are issues like
- access to files
- access to memory
- execution of programs
- sharing data with other principals
Access is controlled at different levels:
- application
- middleware
- operating system
- hardware
The complexity of administering Access Control is growing complexity.
Hardware Protection
Protection Problem: preventing one process from interfering with another
Confinement Problem: preventing programs communicating outwards through other than authorized channels (e.g. memory overwriting)
Intel 80x86 (Pentium) Processors
8088/8086: | any running program controlled the whole machine |
80286: | protected segment addressing and rings, operating systems could run proper |
80386: | built-in virtual memory and large memory segments, treated as a 32-bit flat-address machine |
Rings
- process in ring 0 (kernel) manages privilege level of other processes
- ring 1, 2 usually system processes (e.g. win32 subsys, virtual DOS)
- ring 3 user programs
- gates between rings for executing code at an other level
Other Procssors
Acorn Risc Machine (ARM)
- most commonly licensed to third-party vendors of embedded systems
- 32-bit processor
- separate banks of registers for user and system processes
- hardware protection can be customized
Security Processors
- hardware security support for cryptography and access control
- authorized state
- password covered memory access
s.o.
Operating Systems
- access control for files and processes, ring management, IO-management, memory, processors s.o. as deep as the hardware permits it
- matrix is often used to manage this
- not usable for large organizations, because the administration becomes to difficult for humans
Do it by groups and/or roles !
Groups and Roles
- every user fits into one or some categories
- rights have to be defined for these categories
- user gets role and fits in group
What is the difference ?
There‘s no final definition.
Access Control Lists
- just one column of the access control matrix stored for every resource
- not very performant
- difficult to administrate
Unix
- simple list: owner, group, world for user – not for programs
- indirect method for programs: SUID and SGID
- or by user dummy
Win NT
- more attributes (take ownership, change permission, delete)
- arrangement in domains with trust between them
Capabilities
- just one row of the access control matrix stored for every resource
- some experimental implementatios in the 70s
- today a comeback in the form of public key certificates
Win 2k/XP
- used combined with ACL
- group policies
- active directory
Understands
Granularity |
|
Sandboxing | access to a restricted environment |
Proof-Carrying-Code | tests the behaviour of a program |
Object Request Brokers | controlling calls for several objects/resources |
Problems
- problem if any level doesn’t controll access
- "Every system has at least one bug – Windows much more."
- "The most serious bug is sitting in front of the monitor."
- smashing the stack
- bypassing denied permissions
- trojans
- structural defects in operating systems (Windows user has to be admin for installation)
Background
Decisions were made one time, consequences work eternally, but environment changes very rapidly.
Sometimes, also a developer uses the easier way to reach a goal.
Sometimes it‘s just user friendly.