View source for Performance of a DHT Implementation in the BRN Indoor Testbed

== Objectives == 

* Evaluate performance and scalability of the DHT implementation (Latency, Bandwith, Startup latency, Changes in the network structure)
* Comparation between DHT and traditional approaches (Flooding)
** Difference in fulfilling a request
** Difference in startup and structural change latency 
* Comparation between simulation and experimental results

== Measurement Plan ==

=== Influence Factors ===

* Size of the (core BRN) network in number of nodes
* Number of clients (TODO absolute or per BRN node)
* Changes in the network structure
* TODO Charater of requests?
* TODO Amount of stored data (number of DHT keys)?

=== Measurement Values ===

* Response time of an request (DHT/ARP/DHCP)
* Used bandwidth for fulfilling a request (number of packets or bytes?)

=== Constants during Measurement ===

* Only 1 request at a time

=== Measurement: Latency === 

* Variable number of nodes n
* Only on client
* Measure time for fulfilling a request for DHT and Flooding
* Outcome: Diagram "Response Time against Number of Nodes"

=== Measurement: Bandwidth === 

=== Measurement: Startup Latency === 

=== Measurement: Dynamic Changes in the Structure of the Network=== 

* Measure time for reorganization

== Measurement Setup ==

== Results ==